Conclusion

University of Puerto Rico
Mayaguez Campus
Electrical Engineering Department

Undergraduate Research INEL 4998
Nitinol Propelled Hexapod Robot

 

Home              



Conclusion

 

We have to emphasize that we were very careful in the construction of the robots. We were previously warned of the problems that could occur if inappropriate handling of the parts was conducted. Taking care of these warnings, some details went wrong anyway. Considering these circumstances we conclude that the TRIPOD resulted to be the best assembly from all three configurations. The fact that it moved three legs per pulse, half of the total amount of legs, gave it a good stability in each step. Even though the TWOPOD was the fastest one, it demonstrated to be less stable on walking direction. The TWOPOD demonstrated difficulties in the manual control procedures because of the three different pulses needed to walk and its corresponding connections. Another advantage of the TRIPOD over the TWOPOD was that the current was distributed in 3 legs instead of two, reducing the risk of burning the Nitinol wires. The TRIPOD also proved to be better than the CATERPILLAR in terms of speed. Even though the CATERPILLAR was the strongest on one of the steps, it was notably slow. The TRIPOD was less strong but it demonstrated greater capacity to walk faster.

 

[back to top]


For problems or questions regarding this web contact [Webmaster].
Last updated: December 23, 1998.